Hi everyone, please check identification of this chrysidids...
-- -- -- --
Re: ? Pseudomalus auratus (Linnaeus, 1758), male
Posted: 08 Sep 2011 14:43
by Euchroeus
Hi Vladimir,
also in this case this specimen is not auratus, but it is strictly related with Philoctetes bidentulus. I cannot add anything more than I wrote here viewtopic.php?f=8&t=2247
Even if they look different I won't be surprised if they result to be the same species. P. bidentulus is very variable, even in the same population.
Re: ? Pseudomalus auratus (Linnaeus, 1758), male
Posted: 09 Sep 2011 17:12
by Vladimir
Hi, Paolo. Thanks you for ID, yes, I see that this species is a variable. Regards. Vladimir